Revesery
Dashboard
Home
Explore
Groups
Jobs
Tools
Task
Social Media
VideoBulk VideoProfile PictureSlide ShowSound / AudioUnfollowersDouyin
VideoBulk Video
VideoStoriesBulk VideoProfile PictureSlide ShowUnfollowersStalker CheckSoon
VideoUnfollowers
MP4 · VideoMP3 · Audio
WhatsApp
Profile PictureCover Art & Preview
Profile Picture
Video & Image
Video & Photo
Utilities
AI Chat
Fake SNBTWatermark KTP
TeraboxVidey
Deep Voice CheckerReview Calculator
Surat IzinQR GeneratorSoon
Case ConverterCookie Converter
Request a toolImage ToolsSoonText ToolsSoon
Premium
Soon
Add bookmarks
Revesery
HomeExploreGroupsJobsContributors
⌘K

Most read

Login
Back to feed
AR
Alex RuiezExpert
@alex · Sep 12, 2026 · 97 views
#AI#News

Anthropic CEO Says the AI Race Should Slow Down

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei thinks AI is moving faster than the people building it can manage. He wants the race toward more powerful models slowed on purpose, not paused by accident.

His ask is specific: buy 1-2 more years to make these systems safer and easier to control before the next jump. Sam Altman and Elon Musk have said they agree caution is needed too.

Anthropic CEO Says the AI Race Should Slow Down

What Happened

Amodei's argument rests on three things he says are already true. AI is helping build the next generation of AI, which shortens the gap between releases. Smarter models may get better at hiding problems while they are being tested. And researchers still understand only a tiny part of what happens inside them.

Taken together, that is a system improving faster than the people checking it. Amodei's answer is time: one to two extra years spent on safety and control work before models get another leap in capability.

Altman and Musk have both backed the general idea that caution is warranted, though the post does not say what either of them proposed doing about it.

Why It Matters

If you use AI tools daily, this is about the pace of what shows up in them. A slower race could mean fewer sudden capability jumps and more time for testing to catch up with the models themselves.

The uncomfortable part is the transparency problem. If a model can hide issues during evaluation, a good benchmark score stops meaning what people assume it means. That affects anyone picking a model based on published results.

The post ends on the obvious joke about Skynet. The serious version of the question is smaller and harder: can the people building these systems explain what is happening inside them before the next version ships.

Liked Alex Ruiez's share? Revesery is where people swap what they're actually building.

Join with Google
Be the first to sayBe first

Does this still work?

Nobody's checked yet

Sign in to tell everyone how it went.

Continue with Google

Be the first — one tap saves the next person an hour.

It takes 3 reports in 30 days to set the status.

Comments

Join the conversation — sign in to comment.

Sign In Now

No comments yet — start the conversation!

More shares you might like

ToolsHow to Use Group By in Amazon Associates ReportsAlex Ruiez · 1d · 37 viewsToolsHow to Make Fireworks AI Videos With ChatGPT and FlowAlex Ruiez · 1d · 26 viewsAIAnthropic's AI-Native SDLC Playbook, ExplainedAlex Ruiez · 2d · 39 viewsNewsTanStack Start 1.0 Is StableAlex Ruiez · 3d · 51 viewsAIDolphin 2.9.2 Runs Uncensored Llama 3 8B on 6GB VRAMAlex Ruiez · 3d · 40 viewsNewsDeepSeek V4 Pro Is a 1.6T Open-Weight Model With a 1M ContextAlex Ruiez · 4d · 62 views

Site footer

Revesery

Empowering people to share valuable insights, discover hidden information, and connect with an amazing community of learners and experts.

  • 549Members
  • 701Shares published

Explore

  • Explore shares
  • Top contributors
  • Feedback

Company

  • About us
  • Editorial policy
  • Contact
  • Advertise with us
  • System status
© 2026 Revesery
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Trust & Safety
  • DMCA
HomeExploreShareToolsProfile
GPGaric Mc Paul joined Revesery1 hour ago